Academic integrity action guide

Practical steps institutions can take this semester

Academic integrity is not a single checkpoint at the end of a course. It is a connected strategy across people, process, and technology – and it holds only when the layers reinforce one another. This guide maps the violations moving faster than institutional policy, and the actions you can take now without new technology or budget approval.

What’s inside

Built from current research and from what institutions are actually seeing this term:

The integrity hot 7

The seven violations reshaping assessment, from real-time AI agents and identity spoofing to a $1B+ contract cheating market, each rated by how fast it is moving

What the research shows

Five figures from AAC&U + Elon, University of Reading (PLOS ONE), HEPI, and College Board that reframe the conversation with leadership

The people / process / technology framework

Why there is no silver bullet, and what belongs in each layer

Six actions you can start this semester

None requiring new technology or budget approval

Questions to ask of any integrity technology

A six-point checklist for any assessment or proctoring tool, including the one you already own

A curated research and resources list

Where to go deeper

The numbers institutions are working with

60%

of higher-education leaders say cheating has increased since generative AI launched

94%

of AI-written submissions went undetected in a real university examination study

88%

of students used generative AI in assessments in 2025, up from 53% the year before

92%

of U.S. faculty are concerned about AI-facilitated plagiarism and dishonesty

49%

of institutions have a formal AI policy; most faculty still need guidance

Who this is for

Written for the people who own the outcome rather than the incident:

Provosts, deans, and vice-provosts for academic affairs

Directors of online and digital learning

Academic integrity officers and conduct offices

Assessment, testing center, and exam services leads

LMS and edtech administrators evaluating their integrity stack