Less time from the last answer to a published result. TechNet Learning, an IT certification provider in Italy, used to spend hours deciding whether flagged exams were clean. Reviewers now see only the flagged moments, and the same decision takes minutes.
Of staff time saved every month. At ICSE, a certification center, nobody watches whole recordings any more. The AI marks the moments worth checking, so a reviewer opens a session already knowing where to look.
Candidates one proctor can supervise at once. A queue puts the sessions worth watching at the top, so a sitting of 1,500 needs about ten people rather than a room full of proctors.
Eight apps from one vendor, on one contract. Constructor University consolidated three and ended three renewal cycles, three security reviews, and three sets of invoices. Whatever they switch on next sits inside the same agreement.
Every credential you issue is a claim: this person knew this, on this day, under these conditions. Every candidate now has a generative AI within reach, which has changed what an unsupervised result is worth and what you need to be able to show. When the claim is challenged, a number in a gradebook is not an answer. The record of how that number was produced is.
Constructor Assess and Constructor Proctor produce that record as one workflow. It answers five things about every exam: what was asked, who sat it, how they worked, what was decided, and what it tells you. Assess answers the first, the fourth and the fifth. Proctor answers the second and the third. You buy the record.
Everything you need to run a secure exam, and nothing that gets in the test-taker's way.
Upload the material you already teach from and Assess drafts the questions, so a new program does not wait for a question bank to be built first.
Multiple choice, matching, ordering, true or false, short answer, free form, fill in the blank, and Kprime, written by AI or by hand.
Written and open-ended answers are scored against the rubric you set and returned with feedback for that learner. Nothing is released until a person confirms it.
Written submissions are checked for duplicate content as part of the same assignment workflow, rather than in a separate tool afterwards.
A chat plus audio and video channel stays open, so a candidate with a problem is helped rather than failed.
A mobile app delivers the exam where a laptop is not practical, with the same checks applied.
Extra time and modified checks are set per candidate, so an accommodation is not a separate room, a separate paper, and a separate process.
Every session produces a report with the video, the flags, the risk score, and the reviewer who signed it off.
Locks the test environment, blocks restricted applications, and allows the resources you choose. Available on its own as well.
Draft questions from your own material, or bring in a bank you already maintain.
Your team edits, versions, and approves items before a candidate ever sees them.
Candidates come from the course itself, so no list is exported, reformatted, and imported again.
Decide how closely this exam needs watching, from automated checks to live invigilation.
Candidates sit the exam on a browser, a locked-down desktop, or the mobile app, with support throughout.
AI drafts the marks and raises the flags, your examiners confirm or clear each one, and results sync back.
AI reviews the session and raises only what is worth a look. Nobody is scheduled and nobody waits. Suited to coursework, formative quizzes, and practice tests.
The Secure Browser locks the device, and a reviewer confirms or clears every flag afterwards. Suited to midterms, finals, and professional assessments.
A proctor watches in real time, with a side-view camera and a chat and audio-video channel open. Suited to licensure, certification, and high-stakes admissions.
Most institutions assemble this from separate suppliers. Here is what changes when the exam, the oversight, and the evidence sit in one place.
| Capability | Constructor Tech | A typical multi-vendor setup |
|---|---|---|
| Proctoring options | ||
| Proctoring modes | ✓ AI, post-exam, live, plus a no-webcam option, chosen per exam | One or two modes, fixed by the contract |
| Live monitoring | ✓ Up to 150 candidates per proctor, with an AI-prioritized queue | Small groups per proctor, often staffed by the supplier |
| Talking to candidates | ✓ Chat plus audio and video | Commonly chat only |
| Device coverage | ✓ Browser, desktop, and a mobile app | Browser and desktop |
| Detection and AI | ||
| Identity verification | ✓ Face matching together with the ID document | Often an ID check without face matching |
| Second camera | ✓ Included, set up from the candidate’s own phone | One camera at a time, or a top-tier add-on |
| Virtual machine detection | ✓ Automatic when the Secure Browser is used | Varies, and often needs a live proctor to catch |
| AI for your reviewers | ✓ Alerts and risk scoring surfaced to your own reviewers | AI usually serves the supplier’s proctors, not yours |
| Assessment and platform | ||
| Assessment authoring | ✓ Constructor Assess, on the same platform | A separate purchase, or not offered |
| Wider platform | ✓ One of eight apps sharing accounts and data | A single-purpose tool |
| LMS integrations | ✓ 30+ over LTI, a Moodle plugin, and an open API, or standalone | Usually the major platforms only |
| Deployment | ✓ Cloud, private cloud, on-premise, or air-gapped | Cloud only |
| Compliance | ||
| Compliance posture | ✓ GDPR and FERPA ready, security practices aligned to ISO 27001, regional hosting across five regions | Varies by supplier and region |
Run exams across programs without stitching together a quiz tool, a proctoring supplier, and a spreadsheet. Appeals, accommodations, and accreditation evidence all come from the place the exam ran.
Deliver repeatable testing at volume with the audit trail an awarding body needs, and the evidence to act when a violation is confirmed.
Prove a skill was demonstrated rather than that a course was attended, and add oversight only where a credential is attached.
Buy Assess and Proctor, and the whole suite comes with it. Neither app arrives alone.
Both apps fit the stack you already run. The 30+ LMS integrations belong to Proctor, and Assess connects over LTI and the open API.
Assessment data is among the most sensitive an institution holds, so the default is to collect less of it.
EU data protection, DPA available
Security practices aligned to the framework
US student-record privacy
Accessibility work in progress, external audit under way
You choose the region, and everything stays in it
Responsible AI practices
KVKK, LGPD, PDPA readiness
Demographic-blind flagging, regular bias audits
Join a growing network of resellers, integrators, and solution providers who are bringing Constructor Assess and Proctor to schools, universities, and organizations around the world. Whether you're an edtech distributor, a curriculum provider, an LMS vendor, or a regional training company, we offer flexible partnership models designed to create shared value.
Competitive margins and co-selling support on every deal you bring in.
Training, demo environments, co-branded materials, and a dedicated Partner Content Hub.
Joint campaigns, lead sharing, and visibility in our Partner Locator.
No. Either one can be your subscription and the other arrives at its Foundation level, so you can start with grading and add oversight later, or the other way round. You only get the full record with both, which is why most institutions end up there after the first high-stakes exam.
Yes. Proctor connects to more than 30 platforms over LTI, with a Moodle plugin and an open API, and it also runs standalone. Assess integrates over LTI with Constructor Learn and through the open API. We will map your specific setup during the demo.
You do. AI analyzes the session and raises flags with the video attached, and your reviewer confirms or clears each one. Constructor Tech never issues an integrity outcome on your behalf, and every decision records who made it and when. In Germany that is a legal requirement, not a preference.
A short guided setup: a system check for camera and microphone, identity verification, a room scan if the exam calls for one, and clear instructions on screen. Support is reachable throughout. It is built to feel calm and predictable rather than watched.
Only what each scenario needs is collected. You choose the hosting region, including the EU, Middle East, Turkiye, Brazil, and Asia, or run in your own environment up to a fully air-gapped installation. A data processing agreement is available, and our security practices follow the ISO 27001 framework.
Per user per year, on volume tiers, so the rate falls as your numbers grow. Proctoring can instead be priced per exam, which usually works out cheaper if your exams are seasonal rather than continuous. Tell us your user numbers and your annual exam volume and we will quote both ways so you can take the lower one.
An IT certification provider running 80,000+ exams. Deliberation time on flagged exams fell by 70%, from hours to minutes, at a peak of 1,000+ exams a day.
A procurement software company certifying its own partners. 800+ certification exams reviewed since launch, with 12 confirmed violations acted on through revocations and access restrictions.
An insurance sector training body examining 50,000+ participants a year. Physical exams previously ran across seven to eight provinces.
