Blogs

Proving mastery in the age of AI: questions higher-ed leaders are asking
Proving mastery in the age of AI: questions higher-ed leaders are asking
Answers to the questions higher-ed leaders asked at our webinar with Instructure: what a grade should prove when AI can produce the answer, and how proctoring and AI grading in Canvas fit in.

Answers and takeaways from our webinar with Instructure on designing assessment for what comes next

Proving mastery in the age of AI: questions higher-ed leaders are asking
Study: anti-cheating tools work
Study: anti-cheating tools work
Study: anti-cheating tools work
Lowering the stakes of assessment to reduce cheating
Lowering the stakes of assessment to reduce cheating
Reducing the value of assessments as a prevention strategy for academic misconduct is very unlikely to work. Worse, the evidence shows that lowering assessment values may in fact encourage and incentivize cheating.
Lowering the stakes of assessment to reduce cheating
Houston, we have a problem
Houston, we have a problem
Two recent news reports highlight the ongoing and dramatic increase in cheating.
Houston, we have a problem
A pointless sting, blackmail, and no surprise whatsoever
A pointless sting, blackmail, and no surprise whatsoever
Using proctoring signals to students that the assessment has value and is worth protecting. It signals that cheating is known to be a threat and is being addressed.
A pointless sting, blackmail, and no surprise whatsoever
"Actively unethical" - most UK universities use unsupervised, online exams
"Actively unethical" - most UK universities use unsupervised, online exams
"Actively unethical" - most UK universities use unsupervised, online exams