Independent Instructure researchers have validated Constructor Practice Science Labs (Science Labs) as meeting the 'Demonstrates a Rationale' standard under the Every Student Succeeds Act, confirming alignment with ESSA Level IV criteria and establishing a foundation for future evaluation studies examining how Science Labs relates to student learning outcomes.
The validated logic model outlines how virtual science labs support student learning through immersive experimentation, structured inquiry, and integrated assessment: defining inputs, participant activities, measurable outputs, and expected outcomes across short-, intermediate-, and long-term stages.
ESSA evidence ratings help education leaders make confident, evidence-based purchasing decisions. A Level IV designation means Constructor Practice Science Labs is grounded in a clear research rationale, and an impact study is already underway.
Our logic model is built on peer-reviewed research, including meta-analyses covering thousands of students across K–12 and higher education settings.
Reviewed by WWC-certified researchers at Instructure using a rubric derived from ESSA, EDGAR, SEER, and What Works Clearinghouse standards.
Constructor Practice Science Labs is formally aligned with the Every Student Succeeds Act evidence framework used by U.S. districts and education leaders.
The Every Student Succeeds Act defines four tiers of evidence for educational interventions. Each level reflects the strength of research behind a given product or program.
Level IV - Demonstrates a Rationale - requires a well-defined logic model informed by high-quality research, plus an active effort to study the intervention's effects. Constructor Practice Science Labs meets both criteria.

Our logic model draws on years of peer-reviewed studies examining virtual labs, simulation-based learning, and equitable access to science education.
Peer-reviewed studies anchoring our logic model
Grade levels covered across middle and high school
3D immersive experiments aligned to IB, AP, GCSE
Middle and high school science subjects covered
Every design decision in Constructor Practice Science Labs is anchored to a body of evidence on how students learn science best. A few of the studies that shaped the platform:
Brinson - 89% of studies found virtual labs match or outperform traditional hands-on labs across knowledge, inquiry, and analytical skills.
Chernikova et al. - Scaffolded simulations produce substantially better outcomes than unsupported ones, especially for novice learners.
Cromley, Chen & Lawrence - Purpose-built educational simulations deliver the strongest gains in science learning across STEM disciplines.
Merchant et al. - Simulations on standard desktops are effective learning tools, validating multi-platform deployment without expensive VR.
Dickler, Gobert & Sao Pedro - Real-time teacher dashboards lead to targeted interventions and significantly stronger student outcomes.
Pierce & Cleary - School-based digital tool access is the most reliable path to closing the educational digital divide.
— Instructure Research Team, March 2026
A Level IV rating is a starting point, not a finish line. Constructor Tech is already planning a Level III impact study during the 2026–27 school year to measure how Science Labs relates to student learning outcomes, including how many experiments students complete, how much active time they spend on the platform, and how usage connects to learning gains.
Bring evidence-backed virtual science labs to your classrooms. Equitable, safe, and built on research that works.