Research
Efficacy of a computer-based learning program in children with developmental dyscalculia. What influences individual responsiveness?
This study used Calcularis 2.0 with additional training forms. It found that the subjects improved their arithmetic skills even more than with older versions of Calcularis.
Significant percentile improvements for children after Calcularis training
The above-listed publications cite the raw value and z-value improvements of the study participants, which is common for international publications.
Effects of Calcularis training | part 2: changes in psychosocial characteristics (Effekte des Calcularis-Trainings | Teil 2: Veränderungen psychosozialer Merkmale)
Continuing on from Part 1, which appeared in the same publication, this study looked at the influence of Calcularis on mental irregularities, maths performance anxiety and the children’s own perception of their skills.
Effects of Calcularis training | part 1: domain-specific changes (Effekte des Calcularis-Trainings | Teil 1: Domänen-spezifische Veränderungen)
The first ever Constructor-related study investigated whether Constructor's visual and auditory training was fundamentally capable of promoting better spelling skills in children both with and without dyslexia.
Evaluation of a computer-based training program for enhancing arithmetic skills and spatial number representation in primary school children
The authors of this study instructed one third of the participants to practise with Calcularis and another third to practise with Orthograph (the training control group).
Design and evaluation of the computer-based training program Calcularis for enhancing numerical cognition
The purpose of this article was both to introduce the key concepts of Calcularis (user-specific adaptations, multisensory learning, modelling of the neurological development process) and to present the results of the first Calcularis study.
Computer-based learning of spelling skills in children with and without dyslexia
This study set out to investigate two things: firstly, whether the revised version of Grafari (Orthograph), called Dybuster back then, was successful in facilitating greater learning progress, and secondly, whether the resulting improvement in spelling skills could be attributed to enhanced phonological understanding.
